|
Impact of Pad Design and Spacing on AC Breakdown Performance
John Maxwell, Vice President of Engineering, Johanson Dielectrics Inc.
Enrique Lemus, Quality Engineer, Johanson Dielectrics Inc.
15191 Bledsoe St., Sylmar, CA 91342
1.818.364.9800
|
|
High voltage capacitors are used for isolation and transient protection in electronics that
are connected to either phone lines using modems or Ethernet connections. Portable
electronics that use those components are driving to smaller case sizes to increase product
functionality while shrinking both size and weight. As the users of high voltage
capacitors continue driving to smaller high voltage (HV) components, understanding
arcing failures becomes critical in designing and manufacturing those assemblies. There
are interactions between the PWB (Printed Wiring Board) flux residues, humidity
absorption of the board solder mask and flux residue, solder paste used, pad or land shape
and spacing. These end product changes require optimum board layout to achieve both
functionality and size/weight reductions.
The influence of solder mask beneath parts and slots between component pads have
already evaluated(1) for 1206 and 1808 case sizes and that work was used as the spring
board for this study. Observations of both bare boards used in high voltage arcing tests
showed that the arcs were originating at component pad corners in the previous study.
This was the driving force behind evaluating SMT pad shape and spacing impact on high
voltage breakdown performance.
|
Experiment
This study uses two case sizes, 1206 and 1808 sized capacitors with radius vs. square
corner pads using slightly different pad spacing to determine improved assembly
performance when these capacitors are used. Bare boards and capacitors are tested to
failure under AC breakdown conditions to establish a performance baseline. Capacitors
were reflow soldered using no-clean lead free solder paste (SAC305) on those boards.
Additionally assemblies are split with half exposed to 72 hours of 85oC/85% RH and half
tested as soldered. Complete results and breakdown distributions are included in the
appendix.
|
| Pad or Land Designs
Pad designs from IPC 7351 (replacement for IPC-SM-782) “Surface Mount Design and
Land Pattern Standard” were not used due to reduced spacing or creepage between pads
or lands. IPC-7351 1206 and 1808 land sets are shown for reference in Figure 1. Pad
designs more suited for both improved high voltage breakdown performance and low
manufacturing defects were used instead.
Solder mask degrades HV AC breakdown performance(1) so no solder mask was used
between the pads. Figures 2 and 3 show typical rectangular pads and HV pads using a
corner radius of 0.019” (0.5mm) for 1206 and 1808 chips. Spacing for the HV pads were
increased .010” (.25mm) for additional creepage distance while maintaining assembly
manufacturability. Chip capacitors used for high voltage applications typically have
shorter and tighter end ban specifications than do standard chip capacitors to increase
surface creepage distance reducing necessary pad overlap (the distance the capacitor
overlaps the pad) and maintaining high manufacturing yields.
|
 |
| a) 1206 Chips |
b) 1808 Chips |
Figure 1. IPC-7351 1206 and 1808 Land Patterns
|
 |
| a) Typical HV Rectangular Pads |
b) High Voltage Oval Pads |
Figure 2. 1206 Pads
|
 |
| a) Typical HV Rectangular Pads |
b) High Voltage Oval Pads |
Figure 3. 1808 Pads
|
|
Table 1 is a summary of pad or land separation (creepage) for IPC 7351 designs,
commonly encountered HV rectangular pads and oval pads with maximum separation.
| Table 1. Pad or Land Design Pad Separation |
| Case Size |
IPC 7351 |
HV Rectangular Pads |
HV Oval Pads |
| 1206 |
1.4mm (0.047”) |
2mm (0.080”) |
2.25mm (0.090”) |
| 1808 |
2.5mm (0.098”) |
3.5mm (0.140”) |
3.75mm (0.150”) |
|
Test Capacitors
Production 150pF X7R 1808 parts and 120pF 1206 parts were pulled from inventory for
use in these experiments. 2.5kV DC rated 1206 capacitors were used for the small case
size and a 3kV rated 1808 safety capacitors were mounted on those pads. Eighty piece
AC breakdown distributions for both parts are shown in Figure 4. The lower set limit or
LSL is a 10% guard band above the 1500VAC test voltage used in product testing to
insure parts mounted to assemblies pass using different test equipment in various
customer facilities around the world.
|
|
Figure 4. AC Breakdown Distribution for the Chip Capacitors Used
|
Test Results
Table 2 summarizes 80 piece test results for each pad design variation (4) and test
conditions including boards as received, bare chips, boards with parts reflow soldered
with no-clean SAC lead free solder paste and exposed to 72 hours of 85%RH @ 85oC.
The latter boards were tested for AC breakdown within an hour of removal from the
85/85 chamber.
|
| Table 2. AC Breakdown Mean Value Summaries of Pad Design and Evaluation Boards |
| Pad Types |
Bare Boards |
Capacitors Not Mounted |
Caps w/SAC |
Caps w/SAC 85/85 |
| 1206 Chip Case Size |
|
3601VAC |
|
|
| Typical Square Pads |
2393VAC |
|
2676VAC |
2736VAC |
| HV Rounded Pads |
2642VAC |
|
2901VAC |
3022VAC |
| 1808 Chip Case Size |
|
3341VAC |
|
|
| Typical Square Pads |
3477VAC |
|
2846VAC |
2734VAC |
| HV Rounded Pads |
4050VAC |
|
2863VAC |
2767VAC |
|
Conclusions
The impact of radius corners and increased creepage distance was most pronounced on
the 1206 case sized chips with a 200V + increase in breakdown voltage for bare boards,
chips mounted on boards and chips on boards after humidity exposure. An interesting
side note was that breakdown voltages increased on 1206 case sized parts after being
mounted on the boards with or without humidity exposure. The experiments were
repeated with the same results.
The effect on the larger case size was not significantly different enough to take note of.
Perhaps there is a threshold creepage distance that is between 1206 and 1808 case sizes
where increases beyond that distance yields diminishing returns but that was beyond the
scope of this study.
|
References
1) Maxwell, ., Lemus, E. "Arc Season and Board Design Observations" CARTS 2006
Appendix 1. AC Breakdown Distributions
Bare Board Breakdown Capability 1206 Pads
Bare Board Breakdown Capability 1808 Pads
1206 Chip Capacitors Mounted on Boards as Soldered Breakdown Capability
1808 Chip Capacitors Mounted on Boards as Soldered Breakdown Capability
1206 Chip Capacitors Mounted on Boards Breakdown Capability
after 72 Hours of 85oC/85%RH Exposure
11808 Chip Capacitors Mounted on Boards Breakdown Capability after 72 Hours of 85oC/85%RH Exposure
|
|
Notice: Specifications are subject to change without notice. Contact your nearest Johanson Dielectrics
Sales Office for the latest specifications. All statements, information and data given herein are believed
to be accurate and reliable, but are presented without guarantee, warranty, or responsibility of any kind,
expressed or implied. Statements or suggestions concerning possible use of our products are made
without representation or warranty that any such use is free of patent infringement and are not
recommendations to infringe any patents. The user should not assume that all safety measures are
indicated or that other measures may not be required. Specifications are typical and may not apply to all
applications.
|
| Presented at CARTS March 2007 |